Kentucky Community and Technical College System
Marketing & Communications: Today's News

Editorial: A Brighter Future Close to Home

Community colleges would see a net loss in federal funds under Bush's budget, advocates say

Job-training bill that would authorize more grants to 2-year colleges advances in U.S. House

 

The Hazard Herald
February 10, 2005

Editorial: A Brighter Future Close to Home
By Jay K. Box, President/CEO of Hazard Community and Technical College

If you have read our newspaper advertisements, heard our ads on the radio, or seen our promotions on the TV, you most likely realized that our advertisements always close with the statement “Hazard Community and Technical College—A Brighter Future, Close to Home.” The slogan, “a brighter future close to home,” was developed by our Marketing Team almost three years ago. When the team had interviewed current students about why they had chosen HCTC, the group found that students most often responded that the college provided them a quality education at a fair price right here in our community without having to move away from home.

The students’ comments did not surprise us. As one of 16 college districts in the Kentucky Community and Technical College System (KCTCS), Hazard Community and Technical College is proud of our history of providing access to higher education to the citizens of the Kentucky River Area Development District. Our research shows that 62% of all high school graduates within KRADD who attend college enroll at HCTC. In addition, almost nine percent of all adults ages 18-64 in Breathitt, Knott, Leslie, and Perry counties have taken courses at HCTC during the last four years. That number is far and away better than any other community college in the state.

But access to higher education is being threatened. HCTC, as has Kentucky’s other public colleges and universities, has suffered four budget cuts in State appropriations since 2001. The Kentucky Community and Technical College System has been cut $18 million over the last four years. HCTC’s share of that has been over $700,000. Meanwhile costs have continued to rise. And so has tuition.

In 2001, Hazard Community and Technical College’s budget reflected that 25% of the public funds used to operate the college was generated by tuition. Today, that figure is 39%. State government’s continuous cuts to higher education have caused a tuition “tax” to be placed on our students. Although at $92 per credit hour, our tuition remains the cheapest of all of the state’s institutions of higher education, the tuition rate has begun to put a squeeze on our students’ budgets. Over 200 students showed up at a recent tuition hearing conducted by the college and KCTCS. Their message was loud and clear, “if you continue to raise our tuition, we won’t be able to afford to go to college.”

For our HCTC students, the choice is not whether they go to HCTC or to another Kentucky college or university, it is whether or not they go to college at all. This has been most evident with our part-time students. HCTC now enrolls 300 fewer part-time students than it did four years ago. Part-time students do not traditionally qualify for financial aid and there are no scholarships currently available for them. They are working full-time jobs, taking care of family, and just trying to make ends meet. Access is being restricted.

KCTCS and Hazard Community and Technical College are attempting to address the reduction in State funds in several ways. We continue to work with the Governor and our elected state representatives and senators to encourage them to restore the $18 million that has been cut in the last four years. In addition, we are seeking more grants and direct appropriations from the Federal government than ever before. Furthermore, we have begun an ambitious major gifts campaign called “Fulfilling the Promise” that will ask for private donations to supplement our budget and help us reach our educational goals for the next five years.

Yes, Hazard Community and Technical College has provided a brighter future close to home for many decades. However, that access to higher education continues to be threatened by under funding by our State government. Governor Fletcher’s proposed budget does include a minimal increase in funding for higher education. But the proposed budget appears to come up short in restoring the millions of dollars that have been cut from higher education budgets over the last four years. As the General Assembly debates the budget and the proposed tax modernization plan in the coming weeks, I would encourage you to call or write our elected state officials and ask them to support additional funding for higher education. Ask them to keep the future bright for Eastern Kentucky.

 

The Chronicle of Higher Education
February 10, 2005

Community colleges would see a net loss in federal funds under Bush's budget, advocates say

Although President Bush has consistently praised community colleges, including as recently as his State of the Union address last week, the budget he released this week provided them with a mixed message about where they stand among the administration's priorities.

In one part of the spending plan for 2006, the president called for abolishing the $1.33-billion Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Technical Education program, which gives some $400-million annually to community colleges to train students from low-income families for jobs. In addition, he proposed slashing funds for adult education and literacy by 63 percent, to $215-million.

But in another area of the budget, the president proposed $125-million in new funds to support community colleges' dual-enrollment programs, which allow high-school students to take college-level courses for credit. He also put into the spending plan his $250-million proposal from last year for community colleges to train workers for high-growth fields like health care and information technology.

The bottom line would be a net loss in federal funds for community colleges, lobbyists say.

While the budget "opens up some promising new policy approaches," said George R. Boggs, president of the American Association of Community Colleges, it also "scuttles some well-established, proven programs that greatly enhance the ability of our colleges to fulfill their missions."

Chrisanne L. Gayl, policy director at the Workforce Alliance, a Washington-based advocacy group, said that the proposed elimination of the Perkins program signaled a shift in policy because the move would help pay for the president's plan to expand the No Child Left Behind Act to high schools.

"We see it as a move away from career and technical education to a focus at the high-school level on academic skills," Ms. Gayl said. "We think it would have a serious impact on the services that community colleges would be able to provide."

In a report to Congress last summer, the Bush administration said that the Perkins program "produced little or no evidence of improved outcomes for students despite decades of federal investment."

Community-college officials dispute that conclusion. Nick Kremer, executive dean of community, industry, and technology education at Cerritos College, in Norwalk, Calif., said the $1-million his institution gets annually from the Perkins program is used for professional and curricular development and to keep equipment up to date in ever-changing high-tech fields.

Without the money, he said, "I'm just not sure how we would meet those needs in an area like health occupations."

Community-college officials say they were caught off-guard by the proposal to eliminate the Perkins program outright and worry about their chances of saving it on Capitol Hill.

"We think that this environment is different from previous years," said David S. Baime, vice president for government relations at the community-college association. "The emphasis on deficit reduction is shared on all corners of the Hill, and we take it very seriously."


The Chronicle of Higher Education
February 10, 2005

Job-training bill that would authorize more grants to 2-year colleges advances in U.S. House

Congress moved one step closer on Wednesday to expanding a federal program that supports job training at community colleges as a subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives approved the Job Training Improvement Act (HR 27) by a vote of 18 to 15.

That act would renew, or reauthorize, the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, a multibillion-dollar program managed by the Labor Department. The House Committee on Education and the Workforce, of which the subcommittee is part, will discuss the bill next week.

The bill would strengthen the partnership between community colleges, local businesses, and the one-stop centers that provide basic information and job counseling to the unemployed. Community colleges, or groups of community colleges, would receive competitively awarded grants under the bill. The grants would finance job training in fast-growing technology fields with worker shortages.

The bill "authorizes President Bush's proposal to increase the involvement of community colleges in training our workers," said Rep. Howard P. (Buck) McKeon, the California Republican who is chairman of the subcommittee. In his 2006 budget plan, issued on Monday, President Bush called for $250-million to finance job-training programs at community colleges (see article).

Community-college lobbyists, who have asked lawmakers to set aside money for new training programs in high-tech fields at two-year institutions, said they were pleased with the bill.

"Our big focus has been on the community-based job-training program, and we think it is a positive development," said James A. Hermes, senior legislative associate at the American Association of Community Colleges.